THE
STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT /
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF |
TO: |
The Honorable the Members of the Board of RegentsSubcommittee on Audits
|
FROM: |
Theresa E. Savo
|
SUBJECT: |
Board of Regents Oversight – Financial
Accountability |
DATE: |
|
STRATEGIC
GOAL: |
Goal
5 |
AUTHORIZATION(S): |
|
Issues for
Discussion
One item is presented for
discussion with the Members of the Subcommittee on Audits
including:
1.
Completed Audits
Update on
Activities
Proposed
Handling
Discussion and
Guidance
Procedural
History
The information is provided to assist the Subcommittee in carrying out its oversight responsibilities related to audits of financial and reporting practices; performance audits or reviews; ethical conduct issues arising from audits; internal controls; and compliance with laws, regulations, and policies.
1.
Completed Audits
Reports are provided as
follows:
Office of the State Comptroller
Three
Capital Region BOCES
Lake Pleasant
Ossining Union
Free
Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida BOCES
Archives Partnership Trust
Roosevelt Union
Free
For item one (Completed Audits), no further action
is recommended.
N/A
The following materials are
attached:
·
Roadmap
·
Minutes of the February Meeting (Attachment
I)
·
Audit Report Abstracts (Attachment
II)
REGENTS SUBCOMMITTEE ON AUDITS MEETING
ROADMAP
|
Date: March 19, 2007
Time: TBD Location: TBD | ||
TOPIC |
OUTCOME |
WHO |
MINUTES |
Opening Remarks |
|
Chair |
2 |
Review Agenda/Minutes (Attachment I) |
Approval |
|
5 |
Audit Report Abstracts – including audit report on Roosevelt (Attachment II) |
Questions Addressed |
SED and OSC Staff |
50 |
Next Session |
Preview |
Staff |
3 |
Subcommittee Members in
Attendance:
Regent Geraldine D. Chapey,
Chair
Regent Arnold
Regent John
Brademas
Other Members of the Board of Regents in
Attendance:
Regent Harry Phillips,
3rd
Regent Roger B.
Tilles
Regent Chapey opened the meeting and stated that recurring audit findings presented to the Subcommittee illustrates the continuing need to strengthen controls in school districts. She further stated that improvement cannot stop with the audit process, but must involve others in implementing future change.
Regent Gardner stated there should be a better process to ensure the information related to audit results is distributed to all interested parties. He also felt that in extreme cases there should be an enforcement or disciplinary process.
Staff from the Office of Elementary, Middle, Secondary and Continuing Education (EMSC) informed the Subcommittee that with the event of the Accountability Legislation, training is being given where this information can be shared. Deputy newsletters can also be used. In addition, a map of the State could be published on the web with the ability to click on an area and access any audit reports.
Office of Audit Services (OAS) staff indicated they will consider methods to improve the public dissemination of information on the results of audits.
Follow–up items
The Statement on the Governance Role of a Trustee or Board Member is in print format with all changes discussed at the last meeting. It is ready to be presented for signing.
An audit team is currently performing an audit of William Floyd Title I spending. A report will be presented at a future meeting.
The second round of VADIR visits has begun. OAS will be providing assistance with the visits and analysis.
Summary of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Five-Point Plan were shared with the Regents for their review.
Regent Gardner moved to accept the minutes of
the previous meeting and
The first item on the agenda was a briefing
by Gary Price of Toski, Schaefer & Co., P.C. on the State Single Audit. The major programs audited within the
State Education Department for the year ended March 31, 2006 were: Adult
Education – State Grant Program, Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies,
Safe and
The audit findings were presented to the Subcommittee. A subsequent event was noted in the audit. After fieldwork, the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) audit of the Reading First program was released. The OIG looked at the program while the State Single Audit focused on the methodology.
There were five findings that related to the State Education Department. Finding 06-08 related to the Department’s responsibility as a pass-through entity to ensure that subrecipients receiving at least $500,000 in federal funds have an audit performed in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. The A-133 audit report must be submitted within the earlier of 30 days of the receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period. The audit noted that some entities were not complying. The subrecipients that were not submitting an audit were not-for-profits.
Other audit findings:
06-20 – Rehabilitation Services – Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States - Suspension and debarment certifications were not in 2 of 40 contract files tested.
06-21 –– Rehabilitation Services – Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States - Required extensions were not filed timely in 6 of 40 files when the individual’s eligibility was not determined within the required 60 days.
06-22 – Rehabilitation Services – Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States – In 4 of the 40 files reviewed, the individual’s eligibility determination was not signed or dated by the counselor.
06-23 – Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers – There were no site visits or other means to provide reasonable assurance that the subrecipient administers federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and contract provisions.
Completed
Audits
The second item on the agenda was the 26 audit reports presented to the Subcommittee for review. There were three recurring themes in the audits:
· Poor control over capital assets;
· Weak policies and procedures, particularly as they relate to purchasing; and
· Financial systems of control such as separation of duties, cash receipts, and distributions.
The two most significant issues were found in
the audits of the Center Moriches and the
The members of the Subcommittee discussed the potential effect of the new State aid formula and expanded STAR program as it relates to budget development. It was agreed that more training is necessary to assist districts.
In
The members of
the Subcommittee discussed the need to provide additional support and training
for administrators with these audits being used as case studies. EMSC staff
responded that there are new requirements for 175 hours of training for school
business officials. They are
working currently to improve the curriculum.
Attachment
II
Audit Report
Abstracts
Regents Subcommittee on
Audits
March
2007
Office
of State Comptroller | |||
Audit |
Major
Finding(s) |
Recommendation/Response
| |
Three 10th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the Board
inappropriately approved lifetime health insurance benefits for the former
Director of Plant and Facilities.
In addition, the District spent $165,320 for meals and refreshments
at 975 meetings without documentation of who attended the majority of the
meetings or why meals and/or refreshments were provided at any of them;
paid $1,382 in expenditures incurred by two former administrators who
arrived at a conference three days prior to its start and reimbursed
District officials $1,467 for meals that were not supported by itemized
bills; and paid approximately $1,600 for nine cell phones that were not
used during the audit period. The audit also found unsubstantiated
overtime payments totaling $20,320 and control weaknesses over cash
collections that totaled about $3 million in tuition and registration fees
for student and community resident
programs. Furthermore, auditors identified over
$74,000 in contracts that were not bid in accordance with law and District
policy. The District also did
not have written contracts with some professionals. In addition, certain District
officers and employees did not disclose their interest in contracts with
the District. Finally, the District did not establish
policies and procedures to ensure that capital assets were accurately
recorded and properly accounted for and there were no records to indicate
that the District had received money from the sale of ten items approved
for disposal by the Board. |
29
recommendations The report’s recommendations focused on
strengthening policies and procedures regarding employee benefits, meals
and refreshments at District meetings, travel, cell phones, attendance,
cash collections, segregation of duties, unclaimed checks, contracts,
purchasing, and capital assets. District officials generally agreed
with the report’s findings, but emphasized that a different administration
was in place during the period when the problems occurred and that over 95
percent of the recommendations had been implemented prior to the report’s
issuance. | |
3rd Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that Ulster BOCES
Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center (RIC) officials do not have a
system in place to periodically review the access rights associated with
user accounts; personnel had unlimited access to the school districts’
financial accounts systems; the doors to the computer center were not
always secured; and the check stock was not properly
secured. The audit also identified a potentially
sensitive control weakness within the financial management system and
information technology infrastructure maintained by the RIC; however, due
to the sensitive nature of the finding, details of the weakness were
omitted from the audit report. |
0
recommendations District officials generally disagreed
with the audit findings.
BOCES
officials felt they have sufficient controls in place to address the
concerns identified through the audit. | |
9th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the District has a
deteriorating financial condition that is due to recurring operating
deficits in the general fund that totaled over $4.2 million for fiscal
years 2002-03 through 2004-05. The District planned to use fund balances
in 2002-03 and 2003-04 as a financing source instead of raising real
property tax revenue; this decreased the amount of fund balance available
to help finance the 2004-05 budget.
The District then incurred an unplanned operating deficit of about
$1.2 million in 2004-2005, which resulted in a $10,895 general fund
accumulated deficit on June 30, 2005. The audit also found that the
District’s deteriorating financial condition was largely the result of the
Board’s failure to monitor spending and the District’s failure to maintain
accurate and complete accounting records, and implement proper budgetary
practices. In June 2005, the
Board made significant changes in the District’s senior management to
address the fiscal stress.
Over the next several months, the Board implemented a districtwide
“freeze” to correct the current spending plan and respond to the potential
overspending of the 2005-06 budget.
The new administration began track-ing budgeted appropriations to
actual expenditures; however, reporting deficien-cies still existed in
April 2006. Finally, the audit found that the lack
of accurate and complete financial records also prevented the Board and
other officials from properly overseeing and managing the District’s
capital projects. As a
result, expenditures for the District’s capital projects exceeded the
$22.8 million budget by $563,488 by the end of the audit
period. |
9
recommendations The report recommends Board and
District officials carefully monitor the District’s budget, and make
necessary adjustments to avoid unplanned operating deficits and to
maintain an adequate amount of unreserved fund
balance. In addition, the District should
develop and maintain a comprehensive policy for financial management,
internal controls, the accounting process, and the training of key
accounting personnel; designate an individual to be responsible for the
oversight of State aid claims; and ensure that year-end adjusting journal
entries for capital projects are reversed for the next fiscal year. District officials should properly
encumber all obligations to maintain budgetary control and accurate
records. Furthermore, the report recommends the
Board ensure that the District has sufficient staff to maintain the
accounting function and regularly monitor capital project expenditures to
ensure that expenditures do not exceed the approved budget.
Finally, the report recommends that
bond proceeds should be segregated and not commingled with other
funds. District officials generally agree with
the report’s findings and have taken action to address the
recommendations. | |
Capital Region BOCES – Northeastern
Report
2006M-132 3rd Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the BOCES does not
perform a complete regional annual inventory of its technology assets;
BOCES officials have not developed a written disaster recover plan; BOCES
personnel had the ability to remotely access all financial software system
modules at school districts it serves; and the BOCES did not review access
logs to monitor activity within the financial software
system. |
0
recommendations BOCES officials acknowledged the
conditions identified in the report and have developed a corrective action
plan to address them. | |
Lake Pleasant 4th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the District does
not protect its computer equipment from unauthorized access, routinely
back up District data, or have a formal disaster plan because the Board
has not developed policies and procedures to address these
issues. |
1
recommendation The report recommends the Board adopt
policies and procedures to strengthen internal controls relating to IT
equipment storage, data backup, and disaster
recovery. District officials agree with the
report’s findings. | |
Report
2006M-152 3rd Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the District did
not always verify the quantity of goods received prior to payment, place
inventory tags or complete property record cards to identify assets as
they were received, or conduct a physical inventory count of its capital
assets since 1998. Auditors
found that when the District ordered 80 computers and received shipment,
they actually received 100 computers. The discrepancy went undetected by
District officials because the person receiving the shipment did not
provide the purchasing agent or the accounting office with written
evidence of the condition, quantity, and quality of the goods
received. In addition, the
District ordered 80 monitors, of which 14, valued at $1,610 were never
used and stored in the basement of the Middle School. Furthermore, the disposal of 265
computers and 20 printers was not handled according to District
policy. Finally, the audit found that even
though the District has established internal controls related to
purchasing, there are indications that the controls were not operating
effectively. The District was
unable to supply the auditors with documentation that the purchase of a
mower costing $10,099 had been competitively bid, or telephone quotes for
the purchase of a snow-blower costing $7,500. The District also paid an
independent contractor based on claims that did not contain adequate
itemization as to the specific work performed, or hours worked. |
10
recommendations The report recommends District
officials develop a compre-hensive capital asset policy; designate a
property control manager to be responsible for tracking capital assets;
periodically verify their capital assets and determine whether equipment
is necessary prior to purchase; ensure the District’s capital asset
disposal policy is enforced; and enforce and monitor compliance with the
District’s procurement policy as it relates to required number of quotes
for purchases under the competitive bidding thresholds, and the required
documentation to support purchase
decisions. The report also recommends the Board
review its procedures for the audit and approval of claims, and take steps
to ensure that only properly itemized and supported claims, containing the
signature of an officer or employee receiving the materials, are approved
for payment; and enter into written agreements with professionals,
stipulating the services to be provided and the basis for
compensation. The report further recommends that
goods be inspected and counted when received, delivery slips and invoices
should be signed, and the Board and purchasing agent should adhere to the
requirements of General Municipal Law when procuring goods and services
subject to the competitive bidding
laws. District officials agreed with the
majority of recommendations and are taking corrective
action. | |
9th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the Board had not
developed a comprehensive capital asset policy or procedures required to
achieve adequate internal controls.
In addition, the District inventory record does not contain serial
numbers, model numbers, location, and acquisition cost for all
assets. Furthermore, the
District has not performed an annual physical inventory since November
2002. The audit also found that although the
Board developed and implemented a credit card policy, procedures for
monitoring credit card usage were not developed. Auditors found that District
employees submitted gasoline credit card receipts late, which resulted in
the District incurring late payment fees, and that no one monitors
gasoline credit card usage.
|
11
recommendations The report recommends the Board develop
and adopt capital asset policies and procedures that provide for
recording, accounting, tracking, and safeguarding assets; ensure the
property control manager tracks and monitors District assets; review the
practice of loaning equipment; and update its policy to include procedures
for monitoring gasoline credit card
usage. The report also recommends District
officials update the record for each asset or group of assets to include a
description of the item; perform periodic physical inventories to ensure
the accuracy of the records and determine the existence and condition of
the assets; retrieve a piece of loaned video equipment and take an
inventory of the television studio; monitor gasoline credit card usage;
and perform a periodic analysis of individual credit card
usage. Finally, the report recommends the
property control manager ensure that assets are tagged with unique
identifiers and the District should discontinue the practice of selling
equipment to Board members. Officials generally agreed with the
recommendations and a corrective action plan is being
implemented. | |
Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida
Board of Cooperative Educational Services – Internal Controls Over
Selected Financial Activities Report
2006M-157 5th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that two Business
Office employees have unchecked control over sensitive transactions
because their job duties are not properly segregated. One employee handles all payroll
processing and disbursement duties and another handles all cash receipts
collection and recording duties.
Both these employees control all phases of the transactions they
process, have access to the assets, and are not subject to supervisory
review procedures that would prevent or detect errors or irregularities in
their work. Furthermore,
similar control deficiencies were found at the Continuing Education Office
where one employee collects over $400,000 annually for adult tuition and
maintains all tuition accounting records. This employee also performs duties
without any effective verification of the integrity of their
work. Auditors also found that BOCES
inappropriately made five unauthorized payments to retiring employees,
totaling over $7,500. In
addition, they found that the Assistant Superintendent did not share an
inventory report, which identified 485 missing items with an aggregate
cost of $427,522, to the Board or the District Superintendent and did not
require staff to follow up on the missing items. Additionally, the BOCES
deleted 281 of the missing items costing $159,374 from the property
record, without investigation, because they had been missing for two
consecutive annual inventories.
The Board was not informed about the write-off and potential loss
of the items. Finally,
auditors sampled 40 missing items and located 33 of them, showing that the
inventory results were not accurate. |
9
recommendations The report recommends the Board provide
oversight guidance to BOCES manage-ment by adopting and communicating
written internal control policies for payroll and cash receipts; and
evaluate the inappropriate payments made to employees and determine
whether it should pursue recovery. Additionally, BOCES manage-ment should
formally evaluate the design of the Business Office and adult tuition
billing and cash receipts functions and implement a system of internal
controls that adequately safeguards cash resources; formally evaluate the
Assistant Business Manager’s user rights needs for the financial
accounting system and limit their access to only those functions necessary
to perform assigned duties; and utilize the results of physical
inventories to identify, assess, and correct equipment control
deficiencies. Lastly, the report recommends the
District Superintendent and the Board monitor the results of annual
physical inventories and require a prompt, thorough investigation of
losses and other significant
discrepancies. District officials agreed with the
recommendations and have taken corrective
action. | |
Report
2006M-188 6th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that the District Board adopted a code of
ethics for all District personnel in 1997, which prohibited conflicts of
interests. However, it did
not effectively monitor whether District personnel were complying with the
code. Auditors found that the
District’s claims auditor was the corporate secretary and her spouse was
the vice president of an insurance agency that did business with the
District. The claims auditor
had the responsibility of auditing all claims against the District,
including $77,026 in claims paid to her personal
employer. |
1
recommendation The report recommends that the Board
should review its code of ethics and the conflicts of interest provisions
of General Municipal Law, and ensure that District officials and personnel
comply with the requirements of both the code and the
law. District officials agreed with the
recommendation and have taken corrective
action. | |
Report
2006M-195 3rd Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit identified questionable
payments to the former Superintendent and former buildings and grounds
superintendent for improper expense reim-bursements and a questionable
increase in base salary. The audit also found that the
District’s payroll clerk has the ability to create a new employee, input
salary detail, process the payroll, and distribute paychecks. Audit testing revealed six
employees that were added to the payroll without Board
approval. In addition, the audit found the
business office manager is directly responsible for collecting and
depositing cash, recording cash receipts in the accounting records, and
reconciling the bank accounts.
Further-more, a test of 15 open purchase orders showed that 6
exceeded the amount authorized. Finally, the audit found that District
officials did not conduct periodic physical inventories, or positively
identify assets on the capital asset list. Audit testing revealed that of the
55 assets tested, none were tagged. |
8
recommendations The report recommends that the Board
segregate payroll duties; establish and monitor procedures to ensure that
the payroll clerk does not add names to the payroll without Board
authorization; ensure that payments made to senior managers are in
conformance with established employment contracts, and that valid
employment contracts are in place for all managers; design controls over
cash receipts to ensure adequate segregation of duties; and design
controls to ensure that open purchase orders are monitored and
expenditures do not exceed original authorized amounts without
approval. The report also recommends that
District officials conduct periodic payroll payouts where the employees
are required to show identification and sign for their
paycheck. District officials generally agreed
with the recommendations and have taken corrective action. | |
Follow-Up Report (2006-F-43) of the
Archives Partnership Trust, Internal Controls over Financial Operations
(Report 2005-S-24). |
$0
adjustment The Office of the State Comptroller’s
October 2005 audit concluded that the Trust had adequate internal controls
over its financial management operations. The audit also identified several
areas where the Trust could further strengthen its internal controls or
improve compliance with existing policies and procedures. These areas included investments,
procurement and contracting, and equipment and asset management.
The follow up found that Trust
officials have made significant progress in implementing the
recom-mendations made in the initial audit report. Four of the recommendations have
been implemented and three recommendations (which addressed procure-ment
and contracting) were not applicable because the Trust had not awarded any
new contracts since the initial report was
issued. |
| |
Roosevelt Union Free Report
2007M-14 10th Judicial
District |
$0
adjustment The audit found that in fiscal year
2004-2005, the District reported an unreserved general fund balance of
approximately $1.2 million, and in fiscal year 2005-2006, the District’s
general fund incurred an operating deficit of about $5.7 million and
recorded additional negative adjustments of about $1.7 million. As a result, on June 30, 2006, the
District’s accumulated unreserved general fund deficit was approximately
$6.2 million. Auditors
reviewed the 2006-2007 fiscal year budget and concluded that because of
over-budgeted revenues and under-budgeted expenditures, the District may
incur a $6.1 million operating deficit as of June 30, 2007; therefore, the
District could potentially end the 2006-2007 fiscal year with a general
fund deficit of $12.3 million. The audit also found that the District
officials had inappropriately “borrowed” $16 million from the capital
projects fund and “loaned” it to the general fund to pay operating
expenditures. Even though the
general fund has been paid back, Local Finance Law prohibits such
borrowing. Furthermore, the audit concluded that
poor budgeting and financial management practices have been the primary
cause of the District’s deteriorating financial condition. Auditors found the District has
made repeated errors in budgeting for State aid revenue and personal
service expenditures and has appropriated much of its anticipated fund
balance, even after being advised against doing so by the Office of the
State Comptroller. Finally, the audit identified
weaknesses in the District’s purchase order system, purchasing and
procurement controls, use of financial accounting software, and the claims
auditor function. Auditors
believe that these weaknesses have allowed the District to over-spend
budget line items and incur expenses without prior approval. |
10
recommendations The report recommends that the
District’s Board of Education immediately review all projected fiscal year
2006-2007 expenditures with the State Education Department and eliminate
all non-critical items; comply with the 2002 Legislative requirement to
review and annually update the five-year financial stabilization plan for
the District; develop formal budgeting procedures and appoint a budget
officer; not appropriate the entire unreserved fund balance for the next
year’s budgeted expenditures; monitor staffing and program levels
throughout the year to ensure operational costs aren’t exceeded;
periodically review financial activity budget reports; ensure all
purchases contain a purchase order; and appoint a purchasing agent to
review and authorize District purchases.
The report also recommends that
District officials should ensure that software controls prevent the
posting of an expenditure to an overspent account, and that the claims
auditor review and approve all claims prior to
payment. The Board generally agreed with the
report’s findings and has taken action to address the
recommendations. | |