THE
STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF |
TO: |
Higher Education and Professional Practice Committee |
FROM: |
Johanna
Duncan-Poitier |
SUBJECT: |
Master Plan Amendment: |
DATE: |
February 28, 2006 |
STRATEGIC
GOAL: |
Goals 2 and 4 |
AUTHORIZATION(S): |
|
Issue for
Decision
Should the Regents approve an amendment of
the master plan of
Required by State
regulation.
Proposed
Handling
The question will come before the Higher Education and
Professional Practice Committee at its March meeting where it will be voted on
and action taken. It then will come
before the full Board at its March meeting for final action.
Procedural
History
Master plan amendment is needed
because this would be the College’s first doctoral program. St. John Fisher submitted its proposal
in August 2005. The Department
completed its academic review on December 30, 2005 and began a canvass of all
degree-granting institutions in the
Fifteen institutions responded to a canvass.
Four supported the proposal; nine
had no objection.
Teachers
College raised concerns;
1.
The diffuse focus of the program – it’s hard to see how doctoral level work can
be done in a program that encompasses so many
fields;
2.
Whether the College has the faculty and research traditions to be offering a
doctoral program;
3.
The impact on the reputation and marketing of other Ed.D leadership programs in
the region – all Ed.D degrees in the state that are designed as professional
education degrees may be harmed by the introduction of a doctoral program that
uses the Ed.D title but differs substantially in focus and outcome from the
other approved programs in New York State;
4.
The need for such a program, given that the proposal cites waiting lists at
several very prestigious institutions as a
rationale.
The abstract for the canvass, which St. John Fisher prepared, caused
Teachers College to conclude that the program would be in school
leadership. It would not be such a
program and would not prepare school district or building leaders. It would prepare chief executives of
for-profit, not-for-profit, and public entities in fields including business,
health, community service, education, and
government.
With respect to the concerns about authorizing non-doctoral institutions
to offer doctoral study, the College conducted a self-study of its readiness to
offer doctoral programs. Its peer
review team evaluated its readiness as well as the proposed program. It responded to the team’s report and
included the self-study, the report, and its response in its proposal. After reviewing the material and
consulting with the College, the Department has determined that St. John Fisher
is ready to offer doctoral study and that the program would meet registration
standards.
As a
program to prepare chief executives, the proposed program is one in
management. Statewide, ten
institutions offer doctoral study in management. While none of those programs lead to an
Ed.D. degree, Ed.D. programs do exist outside education. The
Recommendation
The Department has determined that the proposed program, if approved, would meet the registration standards set forth in the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. However, because this would be the College’s first doctoral program, the Department will make a peer review visit during its first year of operation.
It is recommended that the Board
approve an amendment of the master plan of
Timetable for
Implementation
If the Regents
approve the master plan amendment, the Department will register the program,
enabling the College to offer it and enroll students.
Information
in Support of Recommendation
Academic
Review
A. Institutional
Information. The
Board of Regents chartered
According to St. John Fisher’s concise mission statement,
B.
Curriculum. St. John Fisher seeks to offer an Ed.D.
program in Executive Leadership. The purpose of the program is to provide
advanced study for executives and managers in business, education, health,
public administration, and other human service sectors. The program would be for senior managers
seeking to become successful chief executive officers. It is not intended for teachers aspiring
to become school leaders or school leaders seeking to become district
administrators. It would offer a
multidisciplinary curriculum focusing on core leadership and management
competencies and research skills needed at leadership levels in today’s complex
organizations. The College’s peer
review team conducted a site visit and found the proposed program to be well
designed, organized, and rigorous with the promise of creating a diverse
community, thus increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in
doctoral programs.
To
qualify for the degree, candidates would complete a minimum of 90 credit hours,
pass an oral and written comprehensive examination, and prepare a dissertation.
Up to 30 credit hours from an
approved graduate degree program may be considered for transfer. All candidates would complete the
program’s core requirements comprising of a minimum of 60 credit hours,
including research methodologies, and the dissertation. The multidisciplinary curriculum in
leadership would use case studies, simulations, and seminars. It would draw from such disciplines as
business, education, health, history, human development, philosophy, psychology,
and public administration. Four
clinical experiences would take place in research hospitals, not-for-profit
community organizations, educational institutions, businesses, and government
agencies.
The
program would be based on a cohort-paced model. Classes would meet year round in an
alternate weekend format: Fridays, 5:00 - 9:00 p.m. and Saturdays, 9:00 a.m. -
5:00 p.m. The program would use a
systematic approach based on other successful national models that align and
sequence coursework and field experiences with the dissertation. This approach and the corresponding
schedule would make it possible for participants to complete the program in a
timely fashion while continuing their careers.
This
would be St. John Fisher’s first doctoral program. However, the College now offers master’s
degree programs in several related fields, including business, education, and
the health professions.
Specifically, the College now offers M.B.A. programs in Management, M.S.
in Ed. programs in School Building Leadership, and an M.S. program in Human
Service Administration. In 2001-02
(the most recent year available), it awarded 158 master’s degrees, of which 56.3
percent were in fields of Education, 27.2 percent in fields of Business, 9.5
percent in fields of the Health Professions, and the balance in other
disciplines.
C.
Students. St. John Fisher anticipates an initial
enrollment of 25 students, growing to 52 in the second year and 78 in the
third. Thereafter, enrollment would
be stable at 74 students. All
students would be full time.
Admission would be limited to candidates with a master’s degree in a
related field and a proven record of excellence in mid-level leadership and
management. Candidates would have
strong academic backgrounds in business, education, health, human services,
psychology, public administration, or the social sciences.
For
admission, candidates would provide evidence of their potential to meet the
demands of a rigorous doctoral-level program, including a written statement of
purpose, professional writing samples, an on-demand writing sample, evidence of
community service, a minimum of three years of senior management experience, and
three letters of recommendations from successful executive leaders. The selection process includes an
interview by a panel of College faculty members and successful executive-level
leaders who hold doctoral degrees.
The College anticipates that, in the program’s first year, there will be
at least four applicants for every seat.
St.
John Fisher sees the proposed program initially as serving a regional
clientele. It estimates that 70
percent of the first students would come from
To
determine interest, need, and demand for the proposed program, St. John Fisher
surveyed 233 potential students who are currently enrolled graduate students and
graduates of the College and individuals in senior management or leadership
positions, and 102 prospective employers selected from a list of executive
leaders in community agencies, businesses and educational institutions in
St.
John Fisher is committed to actively and aggressively recruiting candidates from
groups that have been historically underrepresented in doctoral-level programs.
The prospective student body would
reflect the range of diversity found in the greater
In
the fall of 2005, St. John Fisher had 2,679 full-time and 849 part-time
students, including 231 full-time and 601 part-time graduate students. Of the full-time undergraduate students
who entered the College in the fall of 1998, 59.2 percent had earned
baccalaureate degrees by 2004, lower than the 65.9 percent average graduation
rate for all independent colleges and universities that
year.
D.
Faculty.
In
addition to existing full-time College faculty who have doctoral program
experience, the proposed program would provide two additional full-time tenure
track faculty positions and two part-time faculty positions dedicated
exclusively to the program. All
full-time faculty working with the program would possess the experiences in
leadership, scholarship, research, and dissertation advisement to support
doctoral-level students, and ensure a high quality program of study. The program would seek to maintain a
student-to-faculty ratio of approximately 6 to 1.
E.
Resources. The proposed program would be offered in
the newly renovated
The
College library’s physical collection contains over 190,000 books, 983
periodical subscriptions, and 4,800 video items. Through the library’s homepage and online
catalog, candidates for the proposed program would have access to a virtual
collection of 8,500 e-books, over 70 databases, scholarly websites, and the
Internet at large. The databases,
selected by librarians in consultation with program faculty, contain full-text
articles from over 8,000 periodical titles and indexing/abstracting for 12,000
titles. Extensive holdings have
been added to support graduate level programs, and with over 50,000 volumes in
Business, Education, Health, Law, and the Political and Social Sciences, and
over 1,200 relevant print and online periodical titles, the library is
positioned to support the proposed doctoral program. In addition to the library resources
noted above, the College is prepared to commit an additional $15,000 per year in
new funds to purchase books, journals, and databases specifically for the
proposed doctoral program to ensure that current and relevant research, reports
and other related materials are readily available for candidates and
faculty.
A
review of St. John Fisher’s audited financial statement for fiscal year 2004
indicated that:
According to unaudited
income statements and balance sheets for fiscal year 2005, the College increased
its net equity by $10.8 million to a total net equity of $80.6
million.
F. Program
Registration. The
Department has determined that the proposed program would meet the standards for
registration set forth in the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. However, because this would be
the College’s first doctoral program, the Department will make a peer review
visit during its first year of operation.
Planning
Review
G.
Need. Priority C8 of the Statewide Plan for
Higher Education is Strong Graduate Programs to Meet the State’s
Needs. The proposed program will be
for senior managers seeking to become successful chief executive officers. According to the Occupational Outlook
Handbook, 2006-07 Edition (December 2005),
All
organizations have specific goals and objectives that they strive to meet. Top executives devise strategies and
formulate policies to ensure that these objectives are met. Although they have a wide range of
titles – such as chief executive officer, chief operating officer, board, chair,
president, vice president, school superintendent, county administrator, or tax
commissioner – all formulate policies and direct the operations of businesses
and corporations, public sector organizations, nonprofit institutions, and other
organizations.
Chief executives have
overall responsibility for the operation of their organizations. Working with executive staff, they set
goals and arrange programs to attain these goals. Executives also appoint department
heads, who manage the employees who carry out programs. Chief executives also oversee budgets
and ensure that resources are used properly and that programs are carried out as
planned.
Top
executives must have highly developed personal skills. An analytical mind able to quickly
assess large amounts of information and data is very important, as is the
ability to consider and evaluate the relationships between numerous
factors. Top executives also must
be able to communicate clearly and persuasively. Other qualities for managerial success
include leadership, self-confidence, motivation, decisiveness, flexibility,
sound business judgment, and determination.
According to the Handbook,
“Top executives held about 2.3 million jobs in 2004,” nationwide, including
444,000 chief executive officers of businesses, educational institutions,
not-for-profit organizations, and government agencies. Service-providing agencies, including
government, employ eight out of ten top executives. It projects employment of top executives
to grow about as fast as the average for all occupations through 2014 (i.e., 13
percent between 2004 and 2014).
However, it estimates that “employment growth is expected to be much
faster than average in professional, scientific, and technical services and in
administrative and support services.
However, employment is projected to decline in some manufacturing
industries.” The Handbook states that “Keen competition is expected for top
executive positions because the prestige and high pay attract a large number of
qualified applicants.” On the other
hand, “Because top managers are essential to the success of any organization,
their jobs are unlikely to be automated or eliminated through corporate
restructuring – trends that are expected to adversely affect employment of
lower-level managers.”
In
developing this proposal, St. John Fisher surveyed potential employers of the
proposed program’s graduates to determine the demand and interest in the
program. According to the proposal,
the respondents “overwhelmingly indicated a need for graduates of this
program. In addition, they were
supportive of the unique features of the program such as format and
content.”
Based on the above
information, the prospects for employment for program graduates are
excellent.
One
of the primary goals of the proposed program is to address the shortage of
individuals from groups historically underrepresented in doctoral-level
programs. Research clearly shows
that there is a severe shortage of and high need for persons of color with
doctoral degrees in all fields.
H.
Effect on Other Institutions.
Based only on their mix of doctoral programs, five institutions might be
affected by St. John Fisher’s proposed program: SUNY Albany, SUNY Buffalo, New
York University,
Fifteen higher education
institutions responded to a canvass of all colleges and universities in the
Teacher’s College was
concerned about “approving doctoral degrees for non-doctoral institutions,
particularly in school administration. . . . Moreover, the need for additional
doctoral degrees in this area is not clear. No state, including
1.
The diffuse focus of the program – it’s hard to see how doctoral level work can
be done in a program that encompasses so many
fields;
2.
Whether the College has the faculty and research traditions to be offering a
doctoral program;
3.
The impact on the reputation and marketing of other Ed.D leadership programs in
the region – all Ed.D degrees in the state that are designed as professional
education degrees may be harmed by the introduction of a doctoral program that
uses the Ed.D title but differs substantially in focus and outcome from the
other approved programs in New York State;
4.
The need for such a program, given that the proposal cites waiting lists at
several very prestigious institutions as a
rationale.
Inadvertently, the proposal abstract sent in the canvass, which St. John
Fisher prepared, caused Teachers College and some of the other respondents to
conclude that the program being proposed was one in school leadership. It would not be a school leadership
program and is not designed to prepare school district or building leaders. It is intended to prepare managers to
assume positions as chief executives of a wide variety of for-profit,
not-for-profit, and public organizations and agencies, in fields that include
business, health, community service, and government, as well as
education.
With respect to the concerns by both Teachers College and
The
proposed program is intended to prepare students to be chief executives. As such, it essentially is a program in
management. Ten colleges and
universities, statewide, offer doctoral study in management. Nine of the ten offer programs leading
to Ph.D. degrees; the tenth offers one leading to the Doctor of Professional
Studies (D.P.S.) degree. None of
these programs leads to an Ed.D. degree.
However, Ed.D. programs outside the field of education do exist. A precedent is found at the