THE
STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 |
TO: |
The Honorable the Members of the Board of Regents |
FROM: |
Michael Abbott |
COMMITTEE: |
Audits |
TITLE OF
ITEM: |
Audit Activities |
DATE OF
SUBMISSION: |
August 5, 2004 |
PROPOSED
HANDLING: |
Discussion |
RATIONALE FOR
ITEM: |
Enable the Board of Regents to review audits |
STRATEGIC
GOAL: |
5 |
AUTHORIZATION(S): |
|
SUMMARY:
The following materials are attached.
· Roadmap
· Minutes of June Meeting (Attachment I)
· Audit Report Abstracts (Attachment II)
· Audit Reports
REGENTS SUBCOMMITTEE ON AUDITS MEETING
ROADMAP
|
Date: September 2004
Time: TBD Location: TBD | ||
TOPIC |
OUTCOME |
WHO |
MINUTES |
Opening Remarks |
|
Chair |
2 |
Review Agenda/Minutes (Attachment I) |
Approval |
Abbott |
1 |
Current Issues |
Update |
Abbott |
10 |
Status of Audit Plan |
Update |
Conway |
5 |
Roles and Responsibilities |
Agreement |
Abbott |
20 |
Audit Report Abstracts (Attachment II) |
Questions Addressed |
SED and OSC Staff |
10 |
Next Session |
Preview |
Staff |
2 |
|
|
|
|
June 22,
2004
Subcommittee Members in Attendance:
Regent Geraldine D. Chapey, Chair
Regent Arnold B. Gardner, Vice Chair
Regent Joseph E. Bowman
Regent Harry Phillips, 3rd
Discussion Items
Regent Chapey opened the meeting by welcoming everyone and reminding them of the importance of accountability in the public sector and our responsibilities under Regents Goal 5.
Previous
Meeting Minutes
The Subcommittee approved the minutes of the prior meeting.
New York State
Single Audit
A partner and senior staff person from KPMG
presented an overview of the federally required single audit and the
Department's involvement. The single audit looks at the Department's internal
controls related to the larger federal grant programs as well as compliance with
federal regulations. The Department receives in excess of $2.5 billion in
federal funds, most of which is sent to local education agencies. The partner
indicated that the Department has done well in the audits with only some
relatively minor findings. The partner stated that, although the Department's
findings were relatively minor, there have been significant findings at other
agencies.
OAS staff were available to answer the Regents questions on the following audits:
Staff from the Office of the State Comptroller were available to answer questions on the following audits:
Prior Meeting
Follow-up
Staff briefed the Members on the on-going situation at the Roslyn Union Free School District. The local district attorney as well as auditors from the Office of the State Comptroller are at the District investigating the extent of the fraud. Staff from the Office of Audit Services will be joining the audit.
Summary of
Subcommittee Activities
Staff presented the Members with a summary of the Subcommittee's activities for the past year. Regent Chapey will present the summary to the full Board of Regents.
Attachment
II
Audit Report
Abstracts
Regents Subcommittee on Audits
September 2004
Office
of the State Comptroller | ||
Audit |
Major Finding |
Recommendations/Response |
Highbridge Advisory Council Family
Services, Inc. Reporting Costs and Enrollments for
Tuition Rate-Setting Purposes 2003-S-3 |
$2,524,991
adjustment
The audit found that about $2.5 million
in expenses reported to the Education Department on the Consolidated
Fiscal Report were not reported in compliance with proper procedures. The
adjustment included $1,866,693 in personal service costs and $658,298 in
other than personal service costs.
The personal service cost adjustments
were caused by the Council improperly charging non-special education
administrative staff to the special education
programs.
The other than personal service cost
adjustments were caused by the lack of documentation of expenditures, most
of which was related to consultant care costs.
The report concluded that some of these
errors appeared to have been designed to mislead or conceal the correct
cost of operating theses programs.
Finally, the report found that the
Council inaccurately reported full-time equivalent student enrollment, had
insufficient Board oversight, was missing time sheets for two employees,
inadequately monitored the provision of IEP mandated services, and did not
monitor the licensing status of teachers.
|
15 recommendations (4 to the
Department)
The report recommends the Department
evaluate the disallowances, provide training, perform follow-up site
visits and verify that the FTE enrollment is calculated appropriately.
The Department agrees with all of the
recommendations. The Department annually provides training on the CFR and
updates the instruction manual, which is available on line to all
providers.
11 recommendations to the
Council
The report recommends the Council
prepare its CFR in accordance with the provisions of the Reimbursable Cost
Manual. Specifically the Council should only include allowable costs,
verify all costs (personal and other than personal service costs) are
appropriately allocated and documented, maintain support for journal
transfers and other adjustments, and ensure executive compensation does
not exceed established limits. The report also recommends the Council
recalculate the FTE enrollment for the 1999-2000 and 2000-01 fiscal
years. The report also
contains recommendations to implement formal procedures to improve Board
oversight related to major Council functions, to require supervisory sign
off on all employee timesheets, to ensure IEP's are maintained for all
special education students, to ensure only IEP prescribed services are
provided, and ensure that all teachers are certified and that all
certifications are current.
Council officials agree with 9 of the
11 recommendations and have already taken steps to implement some. They
believe that many of the other than personal service costs disallowed due
to inadequate documentation were appropriate expenditures. They also
disagree that the executive director's full compensation was not reported
on the CFR. |
No Child Left
Behind 2003-S-47 |
$0
adjustment
The audit found the Department,
districts and individual schools did a good job in carrying out the first
year requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act. The Department’s
oversight and monitoring efforts were effective in enabling districts and
schools to comply with the provisions of the act examined. The audit also
determined that all of a sample of poor performing schools developed
implementation plans and procedures to notify parents of the option to
transfer their children to other schools.
|
0
recommendations |